British Columbia

Snapshot
  • %
    urban points of service |
    %
    rural points of service*
    %
    urban points of service |
    %
    rural points of service
  • 90
    % urban population | 
    10
    % rural population*
  • 22 points of service per 1,113,785 women of reproductive age
    *
  • 27
     crisis pregnancy centre(s)*
Access Overview
  • 22
     publicly listed point of service*
     publicly listed points of service*
    (both medication and procedural abortion offered)
    14
     point(s) of service for medication abortion
    13
     point(s) of service for procedural abortion
    Functional gestational limit of 
    25 weeks
    Functional gestational limit of 
    25 weeks
    *

    Pregnancy Options Line: 1-888-875-3163 throughout B.C. or 604-875-3163 from the Lower Mainland. This service provides information, resources and referral for all abortion services, including counselling, available to B.C. residents. Sex Sense Line: 1-800-SEX-SENSE (1-800-739-7367) throughout B.C. or 604-731-7803 from the Lower Mainland. This service offers general sexual and reproductive health information, as well as referral to resources throughout B.C.

    Pregnancy Options Line: 1-888-875-3163 throughout B.C. or 604-875-3163 from the Lower Mainland. This service provides information, resources and referral for all abortion services, including counselling, available to B.C. residents. Sex Sense Line: 1-800-SEX-SENSE (1-800-739-7367) throughout B.C. or 604-731-7803 from the Lower Mainland. This service offers general sexual and reproductive health information, as well as referral to resources throughout B.C.

    No centralized system to assist the public in connecting with abortion services
    Information about abortion is available on the 
    provincial/territorial website
    Information about abortion is not available on the provincial/territorial website

Medication abortion

Cost coverage

Mifegymiso is fully covered for British Columbia residents with a valid health card.

Billing code

Billing codes are used by physicians to bill provincial/territorial health insurance plans for the different services that they provide. When there isn’t a billing code for medical abortion, physicians can be de-incentivized from providing it.  

The Medical Services Commission's Payment Schedule includes a billing code for medical abortion.

Telemedicine

British Columbia’s Medical Services Plan has billing codes for telehealth that physicians can use when providing telemedicine. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia has a practice standard for virtual care and recognizes that “virtual care is a core component of medical care.” The British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM) states that registrants must follow their employer/provincial policies related to telehealth. 

Telemedicine abortion is currently available from two clinics in British Columbia: Vancouver’s Willow Clinic and Elizabeth Bagshaw Clinic.

Telemedicine abortion has been found to be as safe and effective as medical abortions provided at clinics. Because telemedicine abortion allows patients to access care in their homes and often requires just one trip to a pharmacy or clinic, expanding its availability is critical to improving abortion access for people who live in rural communities, who can’t take time off work to go to appointments, or who are at risk of stigma or discrimination.

Legislation, policies, and regulations

Access to abortion for minors

Under the Infants Act, minors under 19 years of age can consent to medical treatment in cases where the health care provider providing the medical treatment has explained to the minor and has been satisfied that the minor understands the nature and consequences as well as the reasonably foreseeable benefits and risks of the health care, and has made reasonable efforts to determine and has concluded that the health care is in the minor’s best interests.

Bubble zone legislation

Bubble zone legislation aims to prevent anti-abortion protestors from harassing people within the vicinity of a facility that provides abortion care. Even though criminalizing individual people will not effectively curb the larger anti-abortion movement, these laws can be effective in deterring anti-choice protestors from harassing providers and patients entering and exiting abortion clinics.

The Access to Abortion Services Act was passed in 1995 after years of heavy and aggressive protesting at two clinics, especially Everywoman’s Health Centre, and also in response to the shooting of provider Dr. Gary Romalis in November 1995. It is the first piece of bubble zone legislation in Canada. 

Under the Act, facilities must apply for an “access zone,” which is then established through regulations. Homes and offices of doctors who provide abortion are automatically protected, and access zones for the residences of a class of service providers, or the residence of a specific service provider, may be established by regulation. Harassment of doctors and service providers outside of the safe access zone is also prohibited under the Act.

The dimensions of the access zones are calculated from the edge of the lot on which the home or facility is located and are set at: 

  • 160 metres for a doctor's or service provider's home 
  • 10 metres for a doctor's office (which can be extended up to a maximum of 20 metres through an Order in Council) 
  • up to a maximum of 50 metres for a facility 

The Access to Abortion Services Act has faced legal challenges from anti-abortion protestors and has been upheld every time.

Belief-based care denial

Although abortion is an essential medical service, physicians and nurse practitioners can refuse to provide abortion care due to their personal beliefs under current legislation and policies set by regulatory bodies. This practice is often referred to as “conscientious objection,” although a more accurate term may be “belief-based care denial.”

Physicians

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia has a Practice Standard called Access to Medical Care Without Discrimination that states physicians are “expected” to provide patients with “enough information and assistance to allow them to make informed choices for themselves” in cases of “conscientious objection.” However, an expectation is not a requirement, and “information and assistance” is not the same as a referral to medical care.1 Thus, the Practice Standard does not obligate a physician to refer a patient to the medical care they need if they object to providing a medical treatment due to their personal values or religious beliefs.

However, in emergency or urgent medical situations, the Practice Standard states that physicians “are expected to provide whatever medical care is appropriate, considering the patient’s safety, scope of practice and available options.” 

In cases of conscientious objection, the Practice Standard states that physicians should not “discuss in detail their personal beliefs if not directly relevant and should not pressure patients to disclose or justify their own beliefs.” It also directs physicians to practice in accordance with the  Canadian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics and Professionalism, which also doesn’t require physicians to provide or refer for a service they object to based on personal values or religious beliefs.

Nurse practitioners

Nurse practitioners in British Columbia follow the Practice Standard on Duty to Provide Care, which set out that nurses do not allow their personal judgements about a patient’s life or lifestyle to compromise their care by withdrawing or refusing to care for the patient, and explicitly states that “[n]urses do not abandon their clients.”

In cases of belief-based care denial, nurses are obligated to ensure uninterrupted continuity of care for the patient. Specifically, the Practice Standard directs nurses to:

  • ​Listen and, when possible, explore the client’s reason for the request or refusal and their understanding of options that could meet thei​​r needs;
  • ​Do not attempt to influence or change the client’s decision based on the nurse’s c​​onscientious objection;
  • ​Do not allow their beliefs or values to alter or interfere with a client receiving safe, competent, and ethical care;
  • ​Ensure that the most appropriate person within the organization is informed of the conscientious objection well before a client is to receive the requested treatment or procedure;
  • ​Work with their organization/employer to ensure uninterrupted continuity of care including reporting the client’s request and, if needed, safe transfer of the client’s care to a replacement provider; and
  • ​​​Despite their conscientious objection, provide safe care to a client in situations involving imminent risk of death or serious harm that arise unexpectedly and require urgent action for their client’s safety.

Out-of-country medical policy

In some instances, patients may have to travel outside of the country to receive abortion care currently not available in Canada. The Medical Services Plan includes out-of-country coverage for patients referred for insured health services not available in Canada.

The patient’s attending medical specialist must submit an application and receive prior approval from the Medical Services Branch in order for the patient to be eligible for coverage. Prior approval enables the province to negotiate a “reasonable and fair” compensation rate with the out of country service provider. If an application is received after the patient receives care, the patient’s specialist must provide the appropriate documentation.

Travel support

British Columbia’s out-of-country coverage program does not include travel and accommodation costs.

Abortion Services Statutes Amendment Act, 2001

This law requires 34 hospitals across British Columbia to provide abortion facilities and services. It may be amended by regulation in order to add other hospitals to the list.

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act provisions

This law gives the public a right to access information from public bodies, but it limits access to information in some cases. Access to abortion-related information is limited to protect the privacy and safety of those receiving abortion services and those who provide abortion care. Section 22.1 says that in general, public bodies cannot disclose information that relates to the provision of abortion services. Public bodies can only give abortion-related information in 3 situations:

  1. If a person is requesting information about abortion services that they received,
  2. If the information is statistical and discloses only the total number of abortion services provided in the province or a designated region, or
  3. If the information is about a policy related to abortion services.

court cases on abortion

BC Civil Liberties Association v University of Victoria (BC: 2015)

2015 BCSC 39

Following an anti-abortion club's decision to defy directions restricting the club from using campus space for activities, the club was disciplined by the university. The club sought a declaration that any restrictions or regulations imposed on students seeking to use the school for “expressive purposes” be consistent with the Charter. However, the court held that the Charter did not apply to school premises and declined to grant the declaration sought.

Maurice Lewis v. Regina (BC: 1996) / R. v. Spratt (BC: 2008)

2008 BCCA 340

The Access to Abortion Services Act in British Columbia created “bubble zones” around the homes and offices of doctors who provided abortion services in which people cannot carry out anti-abortion protests. In both of these cases, protestors argued the Act violated their right to freedom of expression. The Supreme Court of British Columbia and the British Columbia Court of Appeal both upheld the Act as constitutional.

R. v. Von Dehn (BC: 2013)

2013 BCCA 187

Two anti-abortion activists distributed copies of the Access to Abortion Services Act outside Everywoman’s Health Centre. Under the Act, protestors cannot be present in specific areas around the clinic. The activists claimed that they were not protesting abortion but rather distributing information about the Act. The British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld a lower court’s decision that their behaviour and location constituted protest. 

Re Baby R (1988)

53 DLR (4th) 69

Under the Family and Child Services Act, where a child is “in need of protection”, an apprehension order may be authorized. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Child Welfare apprehended a foetus before its birth. The issue at law was whether an unborn child was a “child” under the Family and Child Services Act. The Supreme Court of British Columbia found that the term “child” referred to living children that have been delivered. The court highlighted that any other “powers to interfere with the rights of women, if granted and if lawful, must be done by specific legislation and anything less will not do”.

Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform v. South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority (BC: 2017 / 2018)

2018 BCCA 344

British Columbia Transit Authority – TransLink – refused to place anti-abortion ads by the Canadian Centre for Bioethical Reform (“CCBR”) on the exterior of its buses, a decision the Supreme Court of British Columbia upheld. On appeal to the British Columbia Court of Appeal, the court allowed the appeal brought by the CCBR and ordered TransLink to reconsider its decision to disallow the ads as the administrative decision-making body provided insufficient analysis of their decision. 

References

1 The Refusal to Provide Health Care in Canada. (2022, November). Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada. https://www.arcc-cdac.ca/media/position-papers/95-refusal-to-provide-healthcare.pdf

top
Arrow to the right